Mindfields.in - First Person
 
 
Mindfields 01 Contents
Breaking the Cast

Surely alternative education isn't separate from alternative living. A first person account of how a few years of alternative schooling changed the way Kaushik Ramu looked at life.

By Kaushik Ramu
Photograph: Avik Chatterjee
 

We all have our share of moulting. But schools are special: every year of schooling is concomitant with some new stage of body and mind, some part in a play with a changing script and a whimsical lightsman. And schools, streets, parents, people, they work on us day and night, like tireless potters, deprecating one another, messing up for us what the caterpillar does so well. But one of my schools changed me very much: instead of trying to mould me, it broke the cast of my upbringing.

Learning by the Kilo

For much of my schooling, studying was by rote. Exams and homework were duties I was born into. One had to stand first in class. And when standing first was applauded, I began to chase it; it fed me. Wheeled by an ambitious mother and backed by an entire pantheon of gods bathed daily in milk, I was quite the model student. When I wasn't, there were scenes, and I was left with all the weight of what I'd done: fine, if I wanted to go astray and wash vessels, it was up to me. So I memorized my answers diligently.  I got accustomed to children in white-and-blue uniforms pouring out, piling up and swarming in noisy eddies around me. There was an assortment of punishments for us - ranging from waist-pinching and good old wooden-scale-whacks on the palm to a sophisticated crouching position, the Hen, in which you gripped your ears from under your knees - all depending on what we did to get the teacher's goat - and sometimes just like that, in a meditative way, when the flies were annoying. The rare teacher might indeed have been dedicated, but there was no sense of doubt or discovery in class - there were just too many of us for that - and in the heat the fans hardly worked.

Stepping Out

Most people in my family were engineers. And most people from my kind of family were either engineers or doctors. An uncle of mine once suggested to the family - when I was about eight and bouncing like a rubber ball - that I should become a doctor, "just to balance it".

My parents began to worry about my schooling. They wanted a respectable place, a boarding school that would teach me values as well as prepare me for entrance exams, that would build my character and personality and groom me into a smart achiever, into a smiling chap with good manners and gold medals and the willingness to show up in silky red veshtis when there were pujas at home.

My mother had misgivings about Krishnamurthi schools because - while they were known to be good, they were for the affluent, you know, boys from rich families, who knows what habits they have. For my father, they were too expensive. But they looked at each other and decided it was the right thing to do.

There's so much to learn, in choosing schools. If my parents had gone around my new school, wondering why there were no ranks, why there was a pottery shed, why there was no beating or disciplining, why children there didn't necessarily become engineers, it might have unsettled them wonderfully.

Stepping In

When I arrived at The Valley School, I was out of place. I was embarrassed about my origins, my chequered Co-Optex bed sheet, my language and my bucket and everything else. I was besieged by American ways. I picked up a patchy accent in an hour, lied about having gone abroad and learned to say 'oboy', 'yeah' and 'nope' before the sun set on the first day. I tucked my striped shirts out.
I caused a riot of giggle and guffaw when I stood at the door once with my hand stretched out and my "May I Come In?" pealed in the ears of the class. There were no rules, no uniforms. You didn't have to stand up while speaking; you didn't have to say 'sir'. Most teachers were 'uncle' and 'aunty' although a few had nicknames you could call them by, and you found yourself dining with them and playing cricket with them, even giving them the glare when your delivery missed their bat's edge.

The campus was green, and wild in places. There was music: sitar from the Art-room, flute from a window. I found etched terracotta on walls, and chunks of chiselled stone at my feet. In Art class, under a thatched roof, I painted two brown hills with a yellow sun rising between them, and it grew as I struggled to make it rounder.  A boy beside me was sketching in quick, firm strokes, and what looked like blades of grass became three men poised on a floor, neither human nor of familiar shape, and it made me uneasy.

My struggle in this new society was to be something, to have an identity given that my previous one was shattered. What would people here approve of? Nobody seemed to care who came first, indeed there were no ranks - so what now? A lady teacher pointed out that I was so comfortable being alone, for a young boy - and I became devoutly comfortable being alone, I held it as my flag and my anthem for years.

I now see that first year as being about stepping over boundaries, clinging to what we know and yet letting go to project new images. It was also, in hindsight, a bend in a long struggle with sincerity.

Opening Up

I was preoccupied with the differences between the CBSE syllabus that I'd come from and the ICSE syllabus here. I'd never heard of Set Theory, for instance, but could quickly calculate missing angles and unspool the tables of savage numbers like 27. I now think this is an important, archetypal difference: the ability to connect and relate versus the ability to calculate and remember.

The school was removed from the noxious fumes of Bangalore. The air was fresh; the grass was alive. You could do that wonderful, timeless thing: sit below a tree with a book. You could watch the lake's ripples, the ducks taking off and returning to squabble, and the villagers wrestling with their sheep at sheep-bath-time. There were no video-games cramping the mind with explosions, no TV shows feeding us instant gratification. You felt the seasons. The monkeys beat us to the fruit, stunning us with their leaps.

There were travellers who came and went: an Israeli architect who was obsessed with domes, and who held up an eggshell to explain how a dome can rest on nothing; a reticent French miniature-artist who travelled the world to display his work and sing with his guitar amongst strangers; a Malayali strummer-singer who sang about bananas, since,  and he was quite convinced of this, everybody likes bananas, and this might unite the world some day. I don't know how they managed it! I wanted to travel too.

Our director sometimes spoke with us about mindsets, and conflict because of mindsets. There was a class on the contrived nature of likes and dislikes, where the teacher compared them to a game of tennis within the conditioned mind. We sometimes made fun of it all, and the teacher was easy to imitate ("Bayker heets from here to there, Leyndil heets from there to here" and so on). But some of these sessions returned to me many years after I left school; they stayed in the mind, like books in a musty attic where a man can read with wonder what he gathered by chance as a boy. In such classes, little windows opened to questions that didn't crystallize to an answer: like anger, death, attachment, right, wrong.

Much of my experience outside class brought my senses to life. Walking back from dinner to the boys' hostel meant going through the wet, dense vegetation at night, the strong perspirations of the earth, the restlessness of monkeys, with Physics and Hindi in one hand and a sputtering torch in the other. Nature comprised not just the dainty flowers: it was the stubbornness of hairy moths, the skins of snakes, the ribs of eaten rodents, the miracles of anthills and kitten-birth and trees felled by rainstorms, the sounds of wild boar in the bushes, the mosaic on the wings of dead butterflies fallen in our paths, the nervousness with which I kept looking back when I walked alone past what we called The Big Banyan Tree.
From the way teachers spoke of the wildlife around us - so casually, almost as if animals were neighbours and postmen - I grew into the assumption that it was all a part of our lives. I learned to admire the elegance of creatures and respect them for what they were. I remember a hot-headed young Indian cobra that, having occupied the path to the hostel, threatened everybody and swore in hisses when an audience gathered; and a senior student, the son of a German naturalist, coaxed it into looping around a long stick that he held - changing ends several times as the cobra drew towards his hand - and then slowly walked to a bush and released it. Nobody shrieked or threw stones or brought forth saucers of milk. And people carried on rather coolly: it was no great event, maybe worth a little dinner-talk but not a fright.

Had I studied these years in a concrete building with thirteen floors in the middle of Bombay, these things might have meant nothing to me: a tree might just have been a tree, as a box is just a box. And I saw that where I came from - where good boys studied hard and did their duties and prayed to god and god took care of the rest- so much was pushed under the carpet that the carpet was an undulating joke.

When I went home during breaks, I found the old order trivial and stultifying. There seemed to be so many assumptions in everything at home that conversation was difficult. My tendency to stand quietly on the balcony got everyone worried. My father, still anxious about the spending on my education, anxious that something should come out of it all, watched me closely, at the dining table, at doors, before guests.

Then, in school, there was all the difficulty of growing up: the groups of boys that formed, with all their codes of conduct, their walking styles and shibboleths, were in some ways a replacement for the strict, bored, waist-pinching teachers of earlier years. We were all terribly insecure: the boys among the boys, the girls among the girls. We were renegades with rule-books, bound by our fears.

But you could take a walk with a girl; no ayahs came looking for you with canes. And occasionally, in those conversations, one ceased to feel tested for virility, and one leaned back on rocks, biting blades of grass, watching the sky and speaking in low tones; one became, occasionally, comfortable with the silence between people, with being free of all that insecurity.
Learning wasn't linked to rewards and punishment. We ran the races on Sports Day with no prizes - we just ran; at least, it was intended that way by the school. Now there were indeed rivalries, and to the two fastest runners in my class - who couldn't stand each other - this race was about proving a point. But for others, it was fun to see how the body responded; it wasn't so bad not to win, not to pump your fist when someone else fell; there was a thrill in just being, in jumping through tyres and returning all muddy.

Many stayed away from the space the school was trying to create; I'm confused about why. It seemed to depend on the parents. If the parents themselves sought such spaces, children broke through the peer norms and found ways of expressing themselves with a freedom they wouldn't have found in a conventional school. But if parents, having paid the fees and signed the forms, left everything else to the school, with fixed ideas of what they expected, their children just shuffled around, chewing gum and looking bored, like toads in the sun, disgruntled prodigies whose place and time were anywhere but here and now. There were other parents who clearly said, pottery and holistic development were all very nice, but what about formulae and shortcuts? A question for a school to ask might be, 'What are the parents learning from their children's education?' If children are stifled at home and then sent for an alternative education, they grow - but like potted plants, like bushes clipped with heavy garden shears.

In Retrospect

Surely alternative education isn't separate from alternative living. I assume that parents who truly want a meaningful education for their children are aware of the vulgarity of life in a world driven by greed and envy, full of machines and gadgetry, with the cities hostile and congested, the air polluted, the water not fit to drink and the people lost without their chips and entertainment.

It's a long shot - a bit of an armchair dream - but if schools could teach you not just how to explore the world, but also how to live, and how to make a living, it might change our lives and make them richer. Now making a living is not the same as maximizing wealth - for the latter, a sequence of coaching classes, an IIT, an IIM and futures-trading on Wall Street will do - it is about that ingenuity which is in abundance in nature, to engage, adapt, improvise and survive.
A friend of mine, a former chartered accountant, was walking in the street one day and suddenly realized he was meant to be a baby-photographer, not an auditor. He huffed and puffed - but managed to get going. It's a small-scale, personal job, with neither Sunday nor Monday, not a job in a large firm driven by metrics, but he's doing wonderfully. It would blend well with a lecture on ecological diversity, as an instance of local adaptation, as an argument against disruptive, large-scale projects. And perhaps a school could nurture such living.

In India, it might be easier than in the developed West to teach a way of life that is part of all the cycles of nature, in which you know what ginger and turmeric can do, how technology can work with natural cycles and not against them, why the topsoil and mangroves are precious to you, how to grow and build things, why a bottle of cola costs you much, much more than ten rupees.

There's the wonder of living, greater than all the percentiles on printed cards. Mathematics and physics are not just in dreary pages, but in the swinging of a cricket ball, in the steady logarithmic growth of a common snail's shell, in the design of the winged seeds of tropical lianas, that glide in windless air. There's history and Shakespeare in the epic struggles of plants- their greed, stratagems, agreements and treachery in trying to grow in cities, fields and crowded rainforests. There's percussion in poetry, music in whale songs, madness within the atom. There are profoundly troubling questions in physics, in my moving unchanged and forever if someone pushed me in space, in the idea of the Milky Way having an edge… My school was a good setting for making such connections, but I didn't look at what we studied deeply enough - maybe at thirteen, I moved away from conventional education too late. I am astonished whenever I discover an extraordinary experience now that I just moped past back then; things forced apart in textbooks are now lying spilled in my mind like paints on a floor, seeping into one another.

© mindfields 2007